Loading
Loading
Most accessibility audits are automated scans with a nice PDF attached. Ours involve an actual engineer testing your site with screen readers, keyboards, and the same methods federal reviewers use. That is why our clients pass on the first try.
Trusted by teams who value quality












Most accessibility audits are automated scans dressed up as expert analysis. A tool runs, a PDF gets generated, and you get a list of color contrast ratios and missing alt text. Things any developer could find with a free browser extension. The hard problems go undetected. Keyboard traps. Screen reader incompatibilities. Focus management that breaks the moment a real user tries to navigate.
Then there is the report itself. Hundreds of issues with no priority, no context, and no clear path forward. Your team spends more time figuring out what the audit means than actually fixing anything.
If your organization has federal compliance requirements, the stakes get real. Section 508 reviewers use manual testing methodologies that automated scanners cannot replicate. A superficial audit tells you everything is fine. Then the real auditors show up and it is not fine. We have cleaned up after this exact scenario more times than we can count.
Every audit maps to the compliance frameworks that actually apply to your organization. No guesswork, no testing against the wrong standard.
The international standard for web accessibility and the baseline for every audit we do. This is what courts reference in ADA cases and what most organizations need to meet.
Required for all U.S. federal technology. We follow the DHS Trusted Tester methodology, which is the same process federal reviewers use to evaluate your product. No surprises when the government tests it themselves.
The law behind most accessibility demand letters and lawsuits targeting private businesses. If you have received legal action or want to prevent it, this is the framework that matters.
The European standard for ICT accessibility, required for EU public sector procurement. If you sell to European governments or need to meet the European Accessibility Act, we cover this as a VPAT add-on.
Every issue documented with screenshots, the specific WCAG criteria it violates, how severe it is, and step-by-step instructions to reproduce it.
Every finding in a sortable, filterable format with severity, affected components, and recommended fixes. Built so your dev team can drop it straight into sprint planning.
The version you hand to leadership. Overall compliance posture, risk level, and key findings without the technical depth. Clear enough for someone who does not know what ARIA stands for.
A prioritized action plan organized by impact and effort. Critical issues first, related fixes grouped together, and realistic estimates for how long each phase takes.
Optional add-on. The formal conformance document that government procurement offices and enterprise vendor evaluations require. We fill it out so you do not have to figure out the format.
A 60-minute live review with your team. We walk through the critical findings, answer questions, and make sure everyone is aligned on what to fix first and why.
We map every unique template, user flow, and interactive pattern in your application. You get a clear scope, timeline, and fixed-price quote before anything starts. No surprises.
Automated scanning first to catch the obvious stuff. Then manual testing: keyboard navigation, screen readers (JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver), cognitive review, and zoom up to 400%. The part most auditors skip.
Every finding documented with severity, WCAG criteria, reproduction steps, and a recommended fix. You get the full report, an executive summary, and a spreadsheet your team can actually use.
Live walkthrough with your team. We go through the critical findings, answer questions, and align on the remediation roadmap. You leave knowing exactly what to do next.
Automated tools are where we start, not where we stop. Every audit begins with axe-core and Lighthouse scans to catch the obvious stuff: missing alt text, ARIA misuse, color contrast failures. These tools reliably catch about 30% of real-world accessibility barriers. That is useful. It is also not an audit.
The remaining 70% requires a human at a keyboard. We navigate every interactive flow using only a keyboard, testing tab order, focus visibility, skip links, and trap scenarios. Then we repeat key flows with JAWS, NVDA, and VoiceOver to confirm that screen reader users can access the same information and complete the same tasks. This is the part that matters, and it is the part most vendors skip.
We also evaluate cognitive accessibility: reading level, error recovery patterns, motion sensitivity, and whether the interface communicates state changes clearly. A site can pass every WCAG criterion on paper and still be unusable. We test for both, from our office in Boise to clients across the country.
Pricing depends on the number of unique templates, interactive complexity, and documentation requirements. A 10-page marketing site and a 50-template enterprise application are fundamentally different audits. We scope based on actual complexity, not page count. You know the price before we start.
Comprehensive audit and remediation of a federal agency's ServiceNow portal serving 10,000+ employees. Achieved Section 508 compliance across all portal widgets.
Full WCAG 2.2 AA audit of a patient-facing healthcare portal handling sensitive medical data. Identified and prioritized 200+ issues across 30 unique templates.
WCAG 2.2 AA audit of a high-traffic e-commerce checkout flow. Identified critical keyboard traps and screen reader barriers across the multi-step purchase process.
No "discovery call" that is secretly a sales pitch. Just a conversation about your application, your compliance needs, and whether we are the right people to audit it. We might be. We might not be. Only one way to find out.
Real feedback from teams we've worked with.
We came to Modern Softworks with an outdated website that was hurting our business. They didn't just rebuild it, they rethought the entire user experience. The site went from embarrassing to something we're proud to send people to. They walked us through every decision like we were part of the team.
What people usually ask before starting an audit. The honest answers.
Facing an ADA demand letter, failed audit, or critical compliance deadline? We offer rapid-response accessibility remediation at $250/hr (minimum $5K engagement).